Archives For google

I have a number of friends who are unemployed, and I’m often sharing various suggestions with them.  I thought it’d be useful to them (and others) to summarize those ideas in one place.

However, I’m not going to show you how to find job openings.  You can use LinkedIn, Monster, HotJobs, Craigslist or any number of other services.  I’m simply going to show you some things that might increase your chances of landing an interview once you’ve found a job that you want to chase.  After that, you’re on your own!

LinkedIn

Studies show that 50-80% of employers use LinkedIn at some point in the hiring process.  Here are some specific things that you should look at:

Profile: At the very least, make sure you have an account with a completed profile (photo, work history, etc).

Status Updates: It’s important to post regular status updates so you can show employers what you’re interested in.  For example, some of my recent updates show my family life, social media news, information about the iPad, Twitter usability and things of that nature.

Use the second level: If you find an opening at a company you like, search for that company on LinkedIn.  If you have a decent sized network, there’s a good chance that someone in your “Second Level” works there.  For example, none of my connections work at Home Depot.  However, by searching for “Home Depot” I find that I have over 100 second level connections.  I can find the one that’s closest to the position I’m interested in, then find out who our common connection is, as seen on the right.  By doing this, I can have Roger connect me to Jim, and now I’m talking to someone inside the organization before I even earn an interview!

Recommendations: LinkedIn has a very cool “recommendations” system.  Ask some of your previous employers/employees/clients to write recommendations for you, which will help to enhance your profile.  Be sure to return the favor for them.

Control Your Search Results

I don’t have exact numbers, but we all know that many potential employers are going to Google you.  What will they find?  If you can take control of your search results, you can determine exactly what they’ll find.

The one catch is that you need to have a fairly unique name.  If your name is Jim Smith, it’s going to be difficult to dominate the search results for that phrase.  For many of us, though, you can easily take control.  Use my name for example (Mickey Mellen).  I have complete control over the first five results for my name, and solid control over 9 of the 10.

How is that done?  The simple way is to have active profiles on a variety of different social networking sites.  If you have active accounts on Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn, those should rise to the top rather quickly.  How do you keep them active?  Read the next section to find out…

Ping.fm

I dicussed Ping.fm a few months ago, and the information there is still relevant.  Use it to post to a variety of services, and those services will slowly rise higher in the search results for your name.  This gives you a great way to have control over a large chunk of the vanity searches for your name, and will show potential employers the kinds of things that you’re interested in (keeping up with industry news, etc).

Once you have things set up, using Ping.fm at least a few times a week; maybe even a few times each day.

Create a custom URL on Facebook

Just a quick tip here — go to facebook.com/username and choose a short address for your profile.  This will help your Facebook profile rank slightly higher for your name, and give you an address you can use on your business card, resume, or anywhere that you think is applicable.

In my case, I changed from a horrible address like “facebook.com/profile.php?id=123456789″ to simply “facebook.com/mickmel“.

Use the same profile picture everywhere

As you get more involved in these various services, it helps if you can brand yourself a little bit.  By using the same photo on every site, people are more likely to recognize you.  Once I found a picture I was happy with, I spent a few minutes and created a variety of sizes of it.  Some of them include:

  • 584×876 — Tall image, simply resized to a decent size
  • 584×584 — Square version
  • 133×200 — Smaller version of the tall image
  • 90×90 — Small and square
  • 75×75 — Smaller and square

I put those in my Dropbox folder, so I always have them with me.  Whenever I register on a new site, I can grab the size/aspect that works best for that site and keep rolling.

Don’t be stupid

This should go without saying, but I’ll say it anyhow.  Once you control all of the top listings for your name, don’t do anything stupid on your account.  Don’t bad-mouth anyone, post inappropriate photos, etc.  The level of sharing is up to you (some people share personal items, others don’t mention their family), but keep it clean and respectful.

Get a  better email address

When I was reviewing applications for my job at Mt. Bethel, I couldn’t help but take notice of their email address.  If someone submitted a resume with an @aol.com address, I started to feel a bit worse about them.  It didn’t affect who we ultimately chose to bring in, but it gave them kind of a bad first impression.

Lifehacker had an article a while back on this kind of topic.  While it likely won’t make or break you, every little thing you do can help.  Personally, I’d recommend either Gmail or a self-branded address (bob@smith.com), but there are a lot of good options out there.

A few other tools

If you’re a Twitter user, the folks at TweetDeck have a new product out called JobDeck.  It’s essentially TweetDeck with TwitterJobSearch tied into it.  Nothing fancy, but could be of value.

If you need help with your resume, CeeVee could be helpful.  There are a lot of online resume sites, but this one seems to have some good stuff going.  If you prefer a different one, please let us know in the comments.

Any other advice for those that are job-hunting?  Share your tips in the comments.

I’m seeing a lot of confusion about the new Facebook privacy settings and I’m hoping this post will help clear things up.

Here’s the short version:

  • Facebook is encouraging you to make more things visible to “everyone”.
  • Facebook wants to continue to allow Google to view the items that you’ve made visible to “everyone”.

This isn’t new — they’ve been allowing Google to index your public information for years. Don’t freak out — they’re not going to automatically index everything unless you’ve been careless with your settings.  Here’s what you need to check:

Go to [settings] –> [privacy settings] –> [Profile Information] –> Look at the items on the right side.  If they say “everyone”, then everyone can see those items.

facebook-privacy

Make the necessary changes on that page.

Next, go to [settings] –> [privacy settings] –> [Search].  This is where you can choose to “allow indexing” by Google.  People are upset about this, but it’s actually a good thing — this has been automatically turned on for years and you couldn’t do much to stop it.  Now they’ve added a checkbox so you can uncheck it to deindex yourself.

allow-indexingThe semi-shady part is that Facebook is nudging people to make more things available to “everyone”, and therefore have more data appear in Google.  Just make sure you have your privacy settings correct and there’s no problem.

In fact, I highly recommend that you continue to “allow indexing”.  Why?  Well, what comes up when people search for your name in Google?  Wouldn’t you like to control that?

By allowing indexing, but then tightening up your privacy settings, you’ll allow your Facebook profile to rank highly for vanity searches on your name.  You want to control those top search results for your name.  If you’re concerned about your privacy, then make sure you control those top results in Google with a site that you can have precision control about what gets posted, rather than allowing some random site to have the first result for your name.  It’s an excellent solution.

I still think Facebook has been a bit shady with this, trying to get people to open more info to “everyone”, but it’s hardly the firestorm that people are saying.

Sometimes it doesn’t take much to drastically improve your ranking in Google.  One of our clients had been tracking their stats since late March and getting a pretty consistent 2-5 visitors/week coming from Google.  A few weeks after we launched their new site, we took a look at the numbers — see for yourself:

search-engine-traffic

After the site launched, traffic from the search engines immediately started going up.  The first week they saw 35 search engine visitors, then 85, then 146!  I expect it will get a bit higher before it starts to level off.

Here’s the key — it wasn’t anything mind-blowing.  They added some new content, but it was mostly just simple things like cleaning up their navigation, fixing the title and header tags, properly linking pages to one another, etc.  Quality SEO isn’t a magic trick; it’s just doing a lot of little things the right way.

We work hard to help our clients rank well in the search engines because that is free traffic. Even better, a properly constructed site can bring in a lot of long tail traffic, which is simply gold.  We put a lot of effort into helping our clients rank well, and the results speak for themselves.  That’s a big reason we don’t put our link on your site.  It’s your site and we want to make sure we help you maximize your exposure.

We certainly can’t promise these kinds of results for everyone, but we can almost always make it better.  Here are a few more examples:

This blog had been around for a while, and the author writes excellent content almost every day.  However, she just wasn’t gaining much traction.  With our help, she went from about 65 search engine visitors/week to almost 600 over the course of a few months!

seo-01

This is a content site that was in pretty good shape, but our tweaks helped it go from 78 to 225/week in just a few months.

seo-02

By working hard to stay on top of the latest changes in the search engine algorithms, and by always putting our clients first, the charts that come after the fact are always fun to look at. :)

You see it all the time.  Browse on someone’s website and you’ll see “Designed by xxxx” or something similar at the bottom.  I don’t do that.  Why?  Simple: it’s bad for your business.

My main goal is to help you succeed. By adding a link to the footer of your site, companies help themselves at your expense and are acting naively, greedily or are simply short-sighted.

One of the best things I do for my clients is to help them rank well in Google.  As a whole, my clients receive over 250,000 visitors each month from Google, and it’s not from any secret trick — it’s just a lot of small pieces that add up to help everyone succeed.  One of those pieces is a lack of unnecessary links on your site to leak your “link juice”.

Pretend for a minute that your home page has 12 units of “link juice” (which is what we’ll use to show the imaginary level of value Google has placed on your site).  You can use those 12 units any way you want.  If you have two links on your home page, each link would get 6 units and those pages would benefit from that by ranking well in Google for their own search terms.  If I toss my link in the footer, then suddenly your 12 units are split three ways, and your other pages only get 4 units each.  That’s not a big deal for a single page, but think about that happening on every page of your site.  By the time Google works its way through your dozens of pages, you’ll have lost so much juice to our silly footer link that it’ll make for a noticeable hit on your bottom line.

Again, this is just a small piece of the big picture.  I also work hard to build your navigation in such a way that Google likes it, make sure your title and header tags are in place, and many other tiny tweaks.  Added up, those things will help put you at the top of Google and bring extra customers to your business.

The short answer is yes.  And no. :)

Matt Cutts explains in the video below.  In a nutshell, he says they haven’t specifically changed the way social media links count toward your site, but they’re always changing the algorithm and some of the changes certainly could have had an impact.  They’ve made about 300-400 changes in the last year, and some of those may have had an effect on the weight of social media links that point to your site.

Anyhow, watch the short video below for Matt’s full answer:

Back in 2001, Google co-founder Sergey Brin appeared on the game show “To Tell The Truth”, where the panel had to determine which of the three contestants was the real “Google Guru”.  It’s quite entertaining.  Check it out below:

It’s something that I’ve suspected, but never had the data to back up — users are typing longer search queries into Google.  As people become more comfortable with search engines, they’re learning that longer queries will help them find what they want much more easily.

search_queries_length

There’s also the thought that searchers may be refining their queries before they click on a single result.  For example, they might search for “blue widgets”, not find what they want, then search for “blue widgets with a small handle” and then click on a result.

They key, as I’ve been saying for a while, is in those long tail searches.  But how can you optimze for searches that you aren’t even aware of?  Google says that up to 25% of all of their queries are brand new — never been searched before.  You simply need to help Google see your content as easily as possible — write solid copy, use H1 tags, title tags, internally link liberally — no new magic here.  Follow the basics and you’ll keep getting this kind of wonderful traffic.

A new tool has been added to your arsenal to help fight against duplicate content on your site, and Google, Yahoo and Microsoft are all on board with it.  Introducing the “Canonical Tag”.

This new tag allows you to specify the desired URL for a page that might have multiple URLS.  For example, you might have:

  • http://www.example.com/products/widget/
  • http://www.example.com/product.php?product=widget
  • http://www.example.com/product.php?product=widget&id=3321

All of those are the same page, but which one should the search engines index?  You can use the <link> tag in the header of the page to make it clear.

In this case, you’d probably add:

<link rel=”canonical” href=”http://www.example.com/products/widget/” />

The link will be treated much like a 301 redirect, though you can’t link to pages on another domain.

More information about this can be found at Search Engine Land, or you can read the official announcements from Google or Yahoo.

While the title says “non-Diggers”, this really applies to anyone who would visit this blog and say “what’s SEO stand for?”

I find that very smart people are very confused about a wide array of technology-related items.  Here are the 10 I hear most often:

Wii Remote10 — The Wii Remote needs to see the screen!

In some cases, yes.  In most cases, no.  I’ve had friends try to point the remote at the screen so it’ll accept a button press, and you’ve had friends do it too.

When you’re moving the cursor around on the screen, it needs to be able to see the bar above (or below) your TV.  If you’re in the middle of a game of Mario Kart, it doesn’t care where that little bar is or who is standing in the way.

Apple iPhone9 — The iPhone is the most advanced phone ever!

The iPhone is great.  I have it, I love it.  It’s slick and it works well, but it’s missing a ton of very basic features.  I traded an N95 to get my iPhone.  The iPhone has a much worse camera, no built-in video capture, a worse battery life and no MMS.  Throw in things that it should have (like copy-and-paste) and it looks even worse.

That being said, it’s still the best phone I know for e-mail and browsing, and that’s my main concern, but it’s got serious weaknesses that other phones don’t have.

Google Earth8 — The government has a live version of Google Earth.

I spend a lot of time on various Google Earth sites, and I’ve found that many people that wonder if Google Earth imagery is in real-time.  When they find out it isn’t, they’re sure that the govenment has access to it.  No.  Trust me.

While I think that real-time imagery in a product like Google Earth will be here someday, I’m pretty confident that we’ll be in the 2020′s before that happens.

Google Logo7 — Sites at the top of Google paid to get there.

They’re not talking about the paid listings; they mean the organic ones.  “You know you can pay Google and they’ll give you a boost, right?”

While there are ways you can pay to possibly move up (paid links), slipping Google some cash under the table won’t do it.  If they were found to be manipulating the organic results for some kick-backs, that could be the end of Google as we know it.

Macbook Pro6 — Macs can’t get viruses

Macs are so much better than PCs because they can’t get viruses, right?  Wrong.  In fact, some studies have shown Macs to be more vulnerable to attacks than Windows machines.  The main issue seems to be a lack of market share, and thus a lack of incentive for evildoers to attack the Macs.

On the other hand, every year we hear that “this year Macs will start to get attacked” because of their growing market share, and yet it never pans out.  Still, people that think Macs are somehow “virus-proof” are idiots.

Website Stats5 — “Hits” are the best measure of a website

As soon as a I hear someone tell me how many “hits” they’re getting on their website, I know I can tune them out.  While hits are a technically accurate measure, they don’t mean what most people think they mean.

For example, our church website got over 12 million hits last year.  Amazing!  Not really.  that was only 115,000 visitors and about3 million pageviews.  Certainly nice numbers, but nothing like the 12 million hits.  When you load a page, every element on the page (images, JS calls, external stylesheets, etc) create a “hit” on the server.  Thus, one visitor looking at one page could easily generate a dozen hits on a site.

Sitting at PC4 — I’m “on” the website right now

While this is somewhat beginning to change, it’s still not accurate.  When you pull up CNN, your computer downloads the HTML, images, etc, shows them on your screen and disconnects from the site.  When you click to another page, your computer reconnects, grabs the HTML/images from that page, and then disconnects again.

You’re never “on” a site — you’re just pulling each page to you.

Identity Theft3 — My identity isn’t safe online

Many people think that just by pulling up a website, your identity can get stolen.  I suppose with the right spyware on your machine it could happen, but it’s unlikely.  The majority of identity thefts occur when people simply give away their info in a phishing scheme.

You can say your identity got “stolen”, but the truth is you gave away to them.

Computer Virus2 — My computer might catch a virus

Viruses are big news, but really are fairly rare.  Many people think of comptuer viruses like human viruses, in that you can just “catch” one.  You can’t.  You need to download an infected file, open an infected e-mail, or visit an infected site with your unpatched browser.

If you keep your PC up to date and you’re not stupid, the odds of being infected with a virus are close to zero, even with out A/V software installed.

Google Logo1 — Google searches the internet

This is the one I hear the most often.  The truth is, Google doesn’t search the internet.  It can’t.  It is impossible for you to search the internet.

Google simply searches a copy of the internet that they store on their servers and update as often as possible.  This creates the illusion of them searching the internet, and it’s a system that works very well.

What other crazy things do you hear from your semi-technical friends?

Rand over at SEOmoz has done a nice little “whiteboard Friday” video about Google PageRank and what it’s really about.

He covers four areas where increased PageRank can benefit a site: crawling, inclusion, freshness and ranking. It’s a fairly short video (8 mins) and it’s well worth your time. Do you agree with Rand’s conclusions?


SEOmoz Whiteboard Friday-What’s PageRank Got to do With It? from Scott Willoughby on Vimeo.