August 11, 2021

The highest isn’t always the best

maxresdefault
Reading Time: < 1 minute

Last year I shared some data that showed that a rating on Amazon of between 4.2-4.5 stars was generally considered more trustworthy than a product with full five-star reviews. Some bad reviews mixed in (ideally with reasonable responses from the owner) tend to make users trust the great reviews even more.

It reminded me today of a funny part of the show “The Good Place“, where Jason Mendoza shares his scale for rating dancers on a scale of 1-13, with 8 being the highest. Check it out here:

If you’ve watched the show, you know that taking any advice from Jason is likely a bad idea, but I thought this was a fun way to look at reviews.

Not unlike Jason’s idea, Amazon and Google reviews go on a scale from 1-5 with 4.5 being the highest. It’s weird, but generally holds true.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Last touch attribution will lie to you

Reading Time: 2 minutesIn the world of marketing, “last touch attribution” is very popular. It essentially says that no matter what a potential customer does before they find…

Read More

Good headlines are a courtesy

Reading Time: 2 minutesWith most things related to business, a “yes” is what you’re really going after but a “no” isn’t bad either. Better to hear “no” today…

Read More

Committees should never be creative

Reading Time: < 1 minuteThere are good sides and bad sides to having committees involved with a project. Oversight and a variety of opinions can be helpful, but things…

Read More